Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion Video
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News World

Rabb Claims Founding Fathers Didn’t Understand Policing

Democratic congressional candidate Chris Rabb endorsed eliminating cash bail on Fox News and argued that 99 percent of police work could be handled by other professionals.

Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos Staff Writer
AUGUST 6, 2026 AT 7:03 PM

Chris Rabb, a Democratic U.S. House nominee, appeared on Fox News Channel’s Hannity program Wednesday evening where he was pressed on his positions regarding law enforcement and criminal justice reform, according to Breitbart News.

When host Sean Hannity directly asked whether Rabb supported eliminating cash bail and establishing a wealth tax, the candidate responded with a simple affirmative.

The exchange grew more contentious when Hannity pressed Rabb on whether he would support abolishing prisons and police departments entirely. Rather than offering a direct answer, Rabb launched into a historical tangent about the origins of policing in America.

Rabb argued that policing as an institution has evolved over time and suggested that the nation’s founders did not understand the term as it exists today. He then claimed that 99 percent of what police officers do could be handled by other trained professionals, effectively arguing for a wholesale reimagining of public safety without traditional law enforcement.

Hannity attempted to refocus the discussion on police who arrest dangerous criminals including rapists, child molesters, and drug dealers. Rabb deflected again, insisting that people performed such functions before the modern concept of police existed, and asked whether Hannity believed in sheriffs and state troopers.

When pressed on whether state troopers should be armed, Rabb stated he believes in the right to arm oneself, though his position on whether law enforcement specifically should carry weapons remained unclear from the exchange.

Notably, when asked directly if he wanted to defund the police, Rabb denied ever making such a statement, despite his earlier comments suggesting significant structural changes to American policing that would effectively eliminate the profession as currently constituted.

The interview highlights the ongoing tension within Democratic circles between progressive activists who seek to fundamentally transform or eliminate traditional policing and moderate voters who remain concerned about public safety and rising crime rates in many American cities.

With information from Breitbart News

Share:
Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos

Stefanos Banos was born in Piraeus and is an editor at NewsFire.GR, specializing in political analysis and international relations. He graduated from the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Bremen in Germany, where he also completed his Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies. Married to Zoi, he is a proud father of three boys.

Chris Rabb, a Democratic U.S. House nominee, appeared on Fox News Channel’s Hannity program Wednesday evening where he was pressed on his positions regarding law enforcement and criminal justice reform, according to Breitbart News.

When host Sean Hannity directly asked whether Rabb supported eliminating cash bail and establishing a wealth tax, the candidate responded with a simple affirmative.

The exchange grew more contentious when Hannity pressed Rabb on whether he would support abolishing prisons and police departments entirely. Rather than offering a direct answer, Rabb launched into a historical tangent about the origins of policing in America.

Rabb argued that policing as an institution has evolved over time and suggested that the nation’s founders did not understand the term as it exists today. He then claimed that 99 percent of what police officers do could be handled by other trained professionals, effectively arguing for a wholesale reimagining of public safety without traditional law enforcement.

Hannity attempted to refocus the discussion on police who arrest dangerous criminals including rapists, child molesters, and drug dealers. Rabb deflected again, insisting that people performed such functions before the modern concept of police existed, and asked whether Hannity believed in sheriffs and state troopers.

When pressed on whether state troopers should be armed, Rabb stated he believes in the right to arm oneself, though his position on whether law enforcement specifically should carry weapons remained unclear from the exchange.

Notably, when asked directly if he wanted to defund the police, Rabb denied ever making such a statement, despite his earlier comments suggesting significant structural changes to American policing that would effectively eliminate the profession as currently constituted.

The interview highlights the ongoing tension within Democratic circles between progressive activists who seek to fundamentally transform or eliminate traditional policing and moderate voters who remain concerned about public safety and rising crime rates in many American cities.

With information from Breitbart News