Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News Europe

Pedro Sánchez Is the New Merkel Spain Moves to Mass Legalize Illegal Immigrants

Spain’s bold move to legalize hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants contrasts sharply with tightened policies in Europe, sparking debate on migration, economy, and shared responsibility.

Panayotis Doumas
Panayotis Doumas Political Advisor & Analyst - NewsFire.GR Director
APRIL 25, 2026 AT 3:26 PM Updated: May 19, 2026 6:57 AM

The Spanish Council of Ministers approved the measure, which is expected to benefit at least 500,000 people. Applicants must prove they have been in the country for at least five months and have no criminal record. The process began on April 16 and will run until the end of June. Residence permits will be issued annually, renewable, and will open the door to employment in the formal economy.

The decision comes as neighboring countries, such as France and Germany, intensify deportations and tighten eligibility criteria. According to estimates, a large portion of those to be legalized come from Spanish-speaking Latin American countries, but the number of Africans and Moroccans—who speak French and may move to other member states—is also increasing. The Schengen Area allows a three-month stay, but the lack of controls at internal borders makes monitoring difficult.

Reactions from European Politicians

French MEP François-Xavier Bellamy called the regulation a “massive reward for illegality” and spoke of strengthening smuggling networks. Bruno Retailleau expressed concern that France and other countries would bear much of the cost of Spain’s policy. Sánchez himself has publicly defended the move as necessary for the economy of a country with an aging population, having published a related article in the New York Times earlier this year.

The measure is striking because Spain is moving against the broader European trend. The new European Pact on Migration and Asylum, which will take effect in June, aims, among other things, for faster return of those not entitled to protection. Madrid’s decision reminds many of the policy followed by Angela Merkel in 2015.

Practical Implications

Among those to be legalized are people already working in sectors such as agriculture, elderly care, and services. However, the leniency of the criteria raises questions about security checks and long-term impacts on social cohesion. The debate in Europe continues, with Spain currently representing the most prominent example of a unilateral approach to migration. This raises the question: Why should the countries that refuse to share the costs of illegal immigration suffer the consequences, while those that encourage and reward illegal immigration, like Spain, do not?

Share:
Panayotis Doumas
Panayotis Doumas

He was born in Athens and is a journalist and producer of online television programs. He attended the Athens College and studied Law and History in Freiburg, Germany. He was an entrepreneur for many years and served as Vice President of the Athens Chamber of Commerce from 2012 to 2015. He has worked as a journalist for the media groups DNM GROUP and ESTIA INVESTMENT GROUP and has contributed articles to the newspapers "Dimokratia," "Estia," "Eleftheri Ora," and "Eleftheros Kosmos," the magazine "STRATEGIKI," and the websites PRONEWS and NEWSBREAK. He is a correspondent for the German weekly newspaper "Junge Freiheit." He is one of the key contributors to the Network of Greek Conservatives and the online channel Right2TheBone.

The Spanish Council of Ministers approved the measure, which is expected to benefit at least 500,000 people. Applicants must prove they have been in the country for at least five months and have no criminal record. The process began on April 16 and will run until the end of June. Residence permits will be issued annually, renewable, and will open the door to employment in the formal economy.

The decision comes as neighboring countries, such as France and Germany, intensify deportations and tighten eligibility criteria. According to estimates, a large portion of those to be legalized come from Spanish-speaking Latin American countries, but the number of Africans and Moroccans—who speak French and may move to other member states—is also increasing. The Schengen Area allows a three-month stay, but the lack of controls at internal borders makes monitoring difficult.

Reactions from European Politicians

French MEP François-Xavier Bellamy called the regulation a “massive reward for illegality” and spoke of strengthening smuggling networks. Bruno Retailleau expressed concern that France and other countries would bear much of the cost of Spain’s policy. Sánchez himself has publicly defended the move as necessary for the economy of a country with an aging population, having published a related article in the New York Times earlier this year.

The measure is striking because Spain is moving against the broader European trend. The new European Pact on Migration and Asylum, which will take effect in June, aims, among other things, for faster return of those not entitled to protection. Madrid’s decision reminds many of the policy followed by Angela Merkel in 2015.

Practical Implications

Among those to be legalized are people already working in sectors such as agriculture, elderly care, and services. However, the leniency of the criteria raises questions about security checks and long-term impacts on social cohesion. The debate in Europe continues, with Spain currently representing the most prominent example of a unilateral approach to migration. This raises the question: Why should the countries that refuse to share the costs of illegal immigration suffer the consequences, while those that encourage and reward illegal immigration, like Spain, do not?