Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News World

Will the House of Representatives brake Trump on Iran?

The U.S. House narrowly approved a Democratic resolution to limit Trump's war powers against Iran by 215-208, though it faces an uncertain future in the Senate.

Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos Staff Writer
JUNE 4, 2026 AT 8:04 PM

Specifically, 215 lawmakers voted in favor and 208 against. Four Republicans crossed party lines and supported the resolution: Thomas Massie from Kentucky, Warren Davidson from Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania, and Tom Barrett from Michigan.

The decision reflects concerns in Congress about the course of operations the U.S. has initiated against Iran, even among lawmakers who typically support Trump.

This vote is largely symbolic in nature. For the resolution to take effect, it must also pass the Senate, while two-thirds supermajorities in both chambers would be needed to override President Trump’s expected veto. It is not even certain that Trump would comply with such a decision.

Administration circles have repeatedly characterized the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as unconstitutional. That particular legislation stipulates that the President must withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities that have not received Congressional approval within 60 days, with the possibility of a 30-day extension for safe withdrawal.

Reactions

Jim Himes, a senior member of the House Intelligence Committee, stated that months after the operations began, the President has not presented a clear exit strategy or end goal that serves U.S. national security. He also noted that 13 American servicemembers have lost their lives, while weapons stockpiles have been depleted and the price of natural gas has increased.

Representative Yassamin Ansari expressed a similar stance, emphasizing that Congress has the authority to decide on such actions.

According to Reuters, the development shows growing concern even in Republican circles about the course of the conflict.

The move comes amid ongoing discussions about the situation in Iran, with President Trump having recently mentioned progress in negotiations, without ruling out new developments.

(Source: Newsbreak)

Share:
Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos

Stefanos Banos was born in Piraeus and is an editor at NewsFire.GR, specializing in political analysis and international relations. He graduated from the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Bremen in Germany, where he also completed his Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies. Married to Zoi, he is a proud father of three boys.

Specifically, 215 lawmakers voted in favor and 208 against. Four Republicans crossed party lines and supported the resolution: Thomas Massie from Kentucky, Warren Davidson from Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania, and Tom Barrett from Michigan.

The decision reflects concerns in Congress about the course of operations the U.S. has initiated against Iran, even among lawmakers who typically support Trump.

This vote is largely symbolic in nature. For the resolution to take effect, it must also pass the Senate, while two-thirds supermajorities in both chambers would be needed to override President Trump’s expected veto. It is not even certain that Trump would comply with such a decision.

Administration circles have repeatedly characterized the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as unconstitutional. That particular legislation stipulates that the President must withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities that have not received Congressional approval within 60 days, with the possibility of a 30-day extension for safe withdrawal.

Reactions

Jim Himes, a senior member of the House Intelligence Committee, stated that months after the operations began, the President has not presented a clear exit strategy or end goal that serves U.S. national security. He also noted that 13 American servicemembers have lost their lives, while weapons stockpiles have been depleted and the price of natural gas has increased.

Representative Yassamin Ansari expressed a similar stance, emphasizing that Congress has the authority to decide on such actions.

According to Reuters, the development shows growing concern even in Republican circles about the course of the conflict.

The move comes amid ongoing discussions about the situation in Iran, with President Trump having recently mentioned progress in negotiations, without ruling out new developments.

(Source: Newsbreak)