Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
Opinion

Raphael Kalyviotis on the “Islamo-Christian” Right in the West

A rising alliance between far-right and far-left factions in the West increasingly embraces Islamism, challenging traditional Western values while aligning with globalist agendas that reject nationalism.

MAY 3, 2026 AT 10:36 PM Updated: May 17, 2026 12:09 PM

Behind the retreat from antisemitism and hatred of capitalism in the West, a phenomenon is rising that unites the far left’s sympathy for the intifada and the far right’s sympathy for Adolf Hitler: Islam.

Both of these trends prefer the rise of Islam over the remaking of the West through an ethno-capitalist model.

While this phenomenon is not unusual on the far left, since the Muslim immigrant has replaced the white worker who ultimately had a homeland, on the right, voices that gained worldwide prominence through their podcasts—such as Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and the neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes—have, based on the war in Gaza and the war in Iran, unfolded their vision of a diluted Christianity that prefers Islamic headgear over Western capitalism.

In the Washington Post, Matthew Schmitz recalls the prophetic novel “Submission” by Michel Houellebecq, which suggests that members of the far right might even come to admire Islam itself.

Tucker Carlson, for example, who constantly emphasizes his Christian faith, contrasts the “white suicide” due to declining birth rates with the Gulf Muslims who still believe in their religion and culture.

Andrew Tate, an alt-right persona, is reportedly said to have converted to Islam because of Islam’s stance on women, aiming to restore a hardline patriarchy as a reaction against radical feminism.

The neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes called on Islamic countries to resist, saying, “America is the seat of the liberal empire that controls the world, and we are enemies of this liberal order.”

He even praised the Taliban as a “conservative, religious force” and did not hesitate to declare that a “Catholic Taliban government” in America would be an ideal arrangement for him.

Candace Owens reads excerpts from the Quran on podcasts and has openly discussed with her husband George Farmer the massive conversions of Westerners to Islam.

There is a small trap in all of this. The real global capital, whose facets we have seen at Davos and the Paris Olympic Games over so many years, moves hand in hand with the waves of Islamist migration to the West. And this is because they share many common elements in concepts and realities they wish to impose.

The first is the Ummah (Islamic community). Against personal conscience, borders, and individual freedom, both Islam and global capital reject borders.

The nation-state is the enemy of globalization, whether under radical Islam or the globalist forces seeking world governance.

The second is Sharia. Religion imposes law within a global Ummah. Globalists also seek their own universal religion through the vehicle of the Ummah.

Christianity, on the other hand, teaches free will and conscience. You do not answer to the state. You do not answer to the oppressor. You do not answer to the ruler. You answer to your conscience, which is aligned with God.

Christianity and Islam are incompatible concepts. Globalization and Islam are not. So, who ultimately defends national forces and who defends globalist ones?

Share:
Rafail A. Kalyviotis
Rafail A. Kalyviotis

Raphaël A. Kalyviotis is a Political Scientist, PhD candidate in Geopolitics, and graduate of the Department of Political Science and Public Administration at the University of Athens. He has specialized in Political Communication and Analysis and has served as a communications advisor and Campaign Manager. He works in the maritime sector. He holds two postgraduate degrees from Cardiff University and the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers, specializing in Maritime Policy and the resolution of marine insurance disputes. He is the Founder and Coordinator of the Network of Greek Conservatives, a regular columnist for the newspapers Estia and Dimokratia, and a scientific collaborator of the monthly journal "New Politics."

Behind the retreat from antisemitism and hatred of capitalism in the West, a phenomenon is rising that unites the far left’s sympathy for the intifada and the far right’s sympathy for Adolf Hitler: Islam.

Both of these trends prefer the rise of Islam over the remaking of the West through an ethno-capitalist model.

While this phenomenon is not unusual on the far left, since the Muslim immigrant has replaced the white worker who ultimately had a homeland, on the right, voices that gained worldwide prominence through their podcasts—such as Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and the neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes—have, based on the war in Gaza and the war in Iran, unfolded their vision of a diluted Christianity that prefers Islamic headgear over Western capitalism.

In the Washington Post, Matthew Schmitz recalls the prophetic novel “Submission” by Michel Houellebecq, which suggests that members of the far right might even come to admire Islam itself.

Tucker Carlson, for example, who constantly emphasizes his Christian faith, contrasts the “white suicide” due to declining birth rates with the Gulf Muslims who still believe in their religion and culture.

Andrew Tate, an alt-right persona, is reportedly said to have converted to Islam because of Islam’s stance on women, aiming to restore a hardline patriarchy as a reaction against radical feminism.

The neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes called on Islamic countries to resist, saying, “America is the seat of the liberal empire that controls the world, and we are enemies of this liberal order.”

He even praised the Taliban as a “conservative, religious force” and did not hesitate to declare that a “Catholic Taliban government” in America would be an ideal arrangement for him.

Candace Owens reads excerpts from the Quran on podcasts and has openly discussed with her husband George Farmer the massive conversions of Westerners to Islam.

There is a small trap in all of this. The real global capital, whose facets we have seen at Davos and the Paris Olympic Games over so many years, moves hand in hand with the waves of Islamist migration to the West. And this is because they share many common elements in concepts and realities they wish to impose.

The first is the Ummah (Islamic community). Against personal conscience, borders, and individual freedom, both Islam and global capital reject borders.

The nation-state is the enemy of globalization, whether under radical Islam or the globalist forces seeking world governance.

The second is Sharia. Religion imposes law within a global Ummah. Globalists also seek their own universal religion through the vehicle of the Ummah.

Christianity, on the other hand, teaches free will and conscience. You do not answer to the state. You do not answer to the oppressor. You do not answer to the ruler. You answer to your conscience, which is aligned with God.

Christianity and Islam are incompatible concepts. Globalization and Islam are not. So, who ultimately defends national forces and who defends globalist ones?