Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News World

House Rebukes Trump, Passes Iran War Powers Resolution

Four House Republicans joined Democrats to pass a war powers resolution 215-208 forcing President Trump to end military operations against Iran, with the measure now heading to the Senate.

Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos Staff Writer
JUNE 4, 2026 AT 5:02 AM

The measure narrowly passed by a margin of 215 to 208, according to New York Post, coming two weeks after House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana withdrew a scheduled vote on the resolution when it became clear Republicans lacked the votes to defeat it.

Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Barrett of Michigan, and Warren Davidson of Ohio were the four GOP lawmakers who sided with the Democratic caucus in supporting an end to the three-month military engagement.

The resolution now advances to the Senate, which passed its own version of a war powers measure last month after several Republican senators also broke with the administration.

Gregory Meeks, the New York Democrat who sponsored the House resolution, characterized the vote as a major bipartisan rejection of what he termed the president’s unlawful military action. Meeks argued that the Trump administration has failed to achieve its stated objectives regarding Iran and has only pushed diplomatic solutions to Tehran’s nuclear program further out of reach.

The congressman described the bipartisan backing as a turning point, claiming that growing numbers of Republicans are responding to constituents who oppose another open-ended Middle Eastern conflict. He called on the Senate to take up the measure immediately and signal to the president that Congress will act if the administration does not.

Fourth Attempt Succeeds

Wednesday’s vote represented the fourth congressional effort to restrict American military engagement with Iran, and the first successful passage of such a measure in the House.

The vote highlights ongoing constitutional tensions between congressional war-making authority and presidential powers as commander-in-chief. The War Powers Act, enacted during the Vietnam era, requires presidents to seek congressional approval within 60 days of initiating military action, though the White House maintains the law is unconstitutional.

The Trump administration has argued that because a ceasefire has been declared in the current Iran conflict, active hostilities have ended, potentially rendering the resolution moot.

Rubio Warns of Negotiating Consequences

Secretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned lawmakers Wednesday that passing the resolution could undermine ongoing negotiations with Tehran. In testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rubio suggested that Iranian leadership might become less willing to reach agreements on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and abandoning nuclear ambitions if they believe congressional action will tie the administration’s hands.

The diplomatic concern centers on whether Tehran will calculate that American military options are constrained, reducing incentives to negotiate in good faith.

With information from New York Post

Share:
Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos

Stefanos Banos was born in Piraeus and is an editor at NewsFire.GR, specializing in political analysis and international relations. He graduated from the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Bremen in Germany, where he also completed his Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies. Married to Zoi, he is a proud father of three boys.

The measure narrowly passed by a margin of 215 to 208, according to New York Post, coming two weeks after House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana withdrew a scheduled vote on the resolution when it became clear Republicans lacked the votes to defeat it.

Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Barrett of Michigan, and Warren Davidson of Ohio were the four GOP lawmakers who sided with the Democratic caucus in supporting an end to the three-month military engagement.

The resolution now advances to the Senate, which passed its own version of a war powers measure last month after several Republican senators also broke with the administration.

Gregory Meeks, the New York Democrat who sponsored the House resolution, characterized the vote as a major bipartisan rejection of what he termed the president’s unlawful military action. Meeks argued that the Trump administration has failed to achieve its stated objectives regarding Iran and has only pushed diplomatic solutions to Tehran’s nuclear program further out of reach.

The congressman described the bipartisan backing as a turning point, claiming that growing numbers of Republicans are responding to constituents who oppose another open-ended Middle Eastern conflict. He called on the Senate to take up the measure immediately and signal to the president that Congress will act if the administration does not.

Fourth Attempt Succeeds

Wednesday’s vote represented the fourth congressional effort to restrict American military engagement with Iran, and the first successful passage of such a measure in the House.

The vote highlights ongoing constitutional tensions between congressional war-making authority and presidential powers as commander-in-chief. The War Powers Act, enacted during the Vietnam era, requires presidents to seek congressional approval within 60 days of initiating military action, though the White House maintains the law is unconstitutional.

The Trump administration has argued that because a ceasefire has been declared in the current Iran conflict, active hostilities have ended, potentially rendering the resolution moot.

Rubio Warns of Negotiating Consequences

Secretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned lawmakers Wednesday that passing the resolution could undermine ongoing negotiations with Tehran. In testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rubio suggested that Iranian leadership might become less willing to reach agreements on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and abandoning nuclear ambitions if they believe congressional action will tie the administration’s hands.

The diplomatic concern centers on whether Tehran will calculate that American military options are constrained, reducing incentives to negotiate in good faith.

With information from New York Post