Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion Video
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News Culture Wars

GOP lawmakers push Hochul to veto bill erasing parental terms from NY law

Republican lawmakers are urging New York Governor Kathy Hochul to veto legislation that would replace "mother" and "father" with terms like "gestating parent" in state family law.

Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos Staff Writer
JUNE 20, 2026 AT 2:39 PM Updated: Jun 20, 2026 2:55 PM

The controversial gender-neutral bill, passed by Democratic majorities in the state legislature, would fundamentally rewrite New York’s child custody, family court, domestic relations, and education statutes by removing traditional parental terms in favor of language focused on pregnancy status, as New York Post reports.

Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, a Republican state senator from Nassau County, joined colleagues Bill Weber of Rockland County and Alexis Weik of Suffolk County in sending a letter to Hochul urging a veto of what they characterize as virtue signaling.

The three Republican senators noted that replacing “father” with “non-gestating parent” undermines the vital role fathers play in children’s lives. They reminded Hochul, herself a mother and grandmother, that young children typically learn to say “mom” or “dad” as their first words.

The lawmakers warned that reducing mothers to the clinical term “gestating parent” represents offensive and dehumanizing language that serves no legitimate policy purpose. They emphasized that mothers remain the core of families and communities as women who work and provide for their children.

Hochul’s office has dismissed criticism of the measure, claiming the legislation changes nothing about how mothers and fathers are actually recognized. The governor has until the end of 2025 to make a final decision on the bill.

Surrogacy Justification Questioned

Democratic sponsors Luis Sepulveda, a state senator from the Bronx, and Assemblywoman Amy Paulin of Westchester County defended the legislation as necessary to address surrogacy situations and same-sex marriage cases within Family Court Law.

Critics have countered that targeted amendments could have addressed those specific scenarios without wholesale elimination of “mother” and “father” from state statutes.

The bill would additionally rename paternity proceedings as “parentage proceedings” and reclassify putative fathers as “alleged parents” throughout New York law.

Albany Democrats pushed the measure through during the final days of the May legislative session with minimal debate, according to Republican opponents. Some Democratic legislators voted against the bill despite their party’s support.

With information from New York Post

Share:
Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos

Stefanos Banos was born in Piraeus and is an editor at NewsFire.GR, specializing in political analysis and international relations. He graduated from the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Bremen in Germany, where he also completed his Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies. Married to Zoi, he is a proud father of three boys.

The controversial gender-neutral bill, passed by Democratic majorities in the state legislature, would fundamentally rewrite New York’s child custody, family court, domestic relations, and education statutes by removing traditional parental terms in favor of language focused on pregnancy status, as New York Post reports.

Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, a Republican state senator from Nassau County, joined colleagues Bill Weber of Rockland County and Alexis Weik of Suffolk County in sending a letter to Hochul urging a veto of what they characterize as virtue signaling.

The three Republican senators noted that replacing “father” with “non-gestating parent” undermines the vital role fathers play in children’s lives. They reminded Hochul, herself a mother and grandmother, that young children typically learn to say “mom” or “dad” as their first words.

The lawmakers warned that reducing mothers to the clinical term “gestating parent” represents offensive and dehumanizing language that serves no legitimate policy purpose. They emphasized that mothers remain the core of families and communities as women who work and provide for their children.

Hochul’s office has dismissed criticism of the measure, claiming the legislation changes nothing about how mothers and fathers are actually recognized. The governor has until the end of 2025 to make a final decision on the bill.

Surrogacy Justification Questioned

Democratic sponsors Luis Sepulveda, a state senator from the Bronx, and Assemblywoman Amy Paulin of Westchester County defended the legislation as necessary to address surrogacy situations and same-sex marriage cases within Family Court Law.

Critics have countered that targeted amendments could have addressed those specific scenarios without wholesale elimination of “mother” and “father” from state statutes.

The bill would additionally rename paternity proceedings as “parentage proceedings” and reclassify putative fathers as “alleged parents” throughout New York law.

Albany Democrats pushed the measure through during the final days of the May legislative session with minimal debate, according to Republican opponents. Some Democratic legislators voted against the bill despite their party’s support.

With information from New York Post