Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion Video
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News Europe

EU Authority Harasses Right-Wing ESN Party in Brussels

A European Union regulatory authority has launched proceedings to potentially strip the right-wing Europe of Sovereign Nations party alliance of its official status and millions in funding.

Dimitris Papafotis
Dimitris Papafotis Editor in Chief
JUNE 13, 2026 AT 4:42 PM

The Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations transmitted a 284-page dossier to the European Parliament, Council, and Commission on May 22, 2026, according to Junge Freiheit. The document formally questions whether the ESN meets registration requirements regarding the European Union’s fundamental values.

The regulatory filing, compiled under Article 13 Paragraph 4 of Regulation 2025/2445, includes a 26-page core analysis supplemented by 258 pages of annexes containing party statutes, court decisions, screenshots, and social media posts. While presented in dry bureaucratic language, the political implications are potentially explosive.

European Party Becomes Enforcement Mechanism

The regulatory framework transforms European party umbrellas into de facto oversight bodies. Under current EU regulations, a European-level party must not only uphold Union values itself but also ensure that all member parties respect these values in their national programs and activities.

The authority alleges 26 violations of Article 2 of the EU Treaty committed by ESN’s nine national member parties during the 20 months between the alliance’s recognition on September 30, 2024, and the end of the investigation period in May 2026. The accusations involve alleged breaches of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law, and minority rights.

The violations are attributed to Hnutie Republika in Slovakia with six alleged infractions, Vazrazhdane in Bulgaria with five, Forum voor Democratie in the Netherlands with four, Reconquête in France with three, Mi Hazánk in Hungary with three, Tautos ir Teisingumo Sąjunga in Lithuania with two, Podatek Dochodowy in Poland with two, and SPD in the Czech Republic with one.

AfD Citation Based on Rejected Court Ruling

Alternative für Deutschland, the German party that serves as ESN’s largest member, receives surprisingly light treatment in the dossier. The only allegation cited against AfD references a February 26, 2026, ruling by the Cologne Administrative Court that actually prohibited classifying the party as confirmed right-wing extremist.

Despite the court ruling against such classification, the authority nonetheless quotes selected passages from the judgment. Several cited “facts establishing doubt” predate the party’s official recognition on September 30, 2024, raising questions about their relevance to the investigation period.

Legal Scholar Questions Selective Enforcement

Alberto Alemanno, a European law professor in Paris, raised concerns about the timing and selective nature of the enforcement action. While welcoming the EU’s use of party financing rules as democratic self-defense, Alemanno noted this mechanism had been blocked or barely applied for years.

The legal scholar revealed that in 2018, he and Laurent Pech attempted through The Good Lobby to trigger review procedures against the European People’s Party over Hungarian party Fidesz and against the European Conservatives and Reformers over Poland’s PiS party, without success according to his account.

The fact that the AfD-influenced ESN now becomes the first major test case creates what Alemanno described as a perception problem. When European party oversight remains largely invisible for years despite rule-of-law debates surrounding Fidesz and PiS, but then activates against ESN, the selectivity appears obvious, he argued.

Party Learned of Charges Through Media

The proceedings became public through a Politico report on May 27. ESN issued a statement that same day noting it first learned of the allegations through media coverage rather than official notification.

The party indicated it expects to receive the full 300-page document to properly evaluate and understand the charges before formulating a comprehensive response.

Millions in Funding and Electoral Infrastructure at Stake

Loss of official EU party status would strip ESN of approximately two million euros annually in EU party financing. Without party status, there can be no foundation with separate EU funding streams.

If the next EU elections in spring 2029 require transnational lists fielded by European parties, one competitor would be effectively neutralized. The beneficiary question looms particularly large in Germany, where a weakened ESN ahead of 2029 would primarily benefit the EPP and thus the CDU and CSU.

Should transnational lists become mandatory for the 2029 elections, the organizational, financial, and symbolic weakening of the AfD-backed ESN would eliminate a major rival before voters cast ballots.

Transparency Demands Mount

The Constitutional Affairs Committee of the European Parliament is now considering召oning Authority chief Pascal Schonard for a closed-door hearing. Committee coordinators from all political groups are deliberating whether to demand Schonard explain the timing and scope of the enforcement action.

The case represents the first major test of whether EU party oversight mechanisms will be applied consistently across the political spectrum or wielded selectively against conservative and sovereigntist movements. The outcome will shape the landscape of European party politics and determine whether regulatory tools designed to protect democratic values become instruments of political competition.

With information from Junge Freiheit

Share:
Dimitris Papafotis
Dimitris Papafotis

Dimitris Papafotis is the editor-in-chief of NewsFire.GR. He was born and raised in Athens. He studied at the Journalism Workshop (1991-1993). He currently lives in Pyrgos, Ilia, where he has been active in radio and various newspapers, while also maintaining his personal blog, Papafotis.gr.

The Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations transmitted a 284-page dossier to the European Parliament, Council, and Commission on May 22, 2026, according to Junge Freiheit. The document formally questions whether the ESN meets registration requirements regarding the European Union’s fundamental values.

The regulatory filing, compiled under Article 13 Paragraph 4 of Regulation 2025/2445, includes a 26-page core analysis supplemented by 258 pages of annexes containing party statutes, court decisions, screenshots, and social media posts. While presented in dry bureaucratic language, the political implications are potentially explosive.

European Party Becomes Enforcement Mechanism

The regulatory framework transforms European party umbrellas into de facto oversight bodies. Under current EU regulations, a European-level party must not only uphold Union values itself but also ensure that all member parties respect these values in their national programs and activities.

The authority alleges 26 violations of Article 2 of the EU Treaty committed by ESN’s nine national member parties during the 20 months between the alliance’s recognition on September 30, 2024, and the end of the investigation period in May 2026. The accusations involve alleged breaches of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law, and minority rights.

The violations are attributed to Hnutie Republika in Slovakia with six alleged infractions, Vazrazhdane in Bulgaria with five, Forum voor Democratie in the Netherlands with four, Reconquête in France with three, Mi Hazánk in Hungary with three, Tautos ir Teisingumo Sąjunga in Lithuania with two, Podatek Dochodowy in Poland with two, and SPD in the Czech Republic with one.

AfD Citation Based on Rejected Court Ruling

Alternative für Deutschland, the German party that serves as ESN’s largest member, receives surprisingly light treatment in the dossier. The only allegation cited against AfD references a February 26, 2026, ruling by the Cologne Administrative Court that actually prohibited classifying the party as confirmed right-wing extremist.

Despite the court ruling against such classification, the authority nonetheless quotes selected passages from the judgment. Several cited “facts establishing doubt” predate the party’s official recognition on September 30, 2024, raising questions about their relevance to the investigation period.

Legal Scholar Questions Selective Enforcement

Alberto Alemanno, a European law professor in Paris, raised concerns about the timing and selective nature of the enforcement action. While welcoming the EU’s use of party financing rules as democratic self-defense, Alemanno noted this mechanism had been blocked or barely applied for years.

The legal scholar revealed that in 2018, he and Laurent Pech attempted through The Good Lobby to trigger review procedures against the European People’s Party over Hungarian party Fidesz and against the European Conservatives and Reformers over Poland’s PiS party, without success according to his account.

The fact that the AfD-influenced ESN now becomes the first major test case creates what Alemanno described as a perception problem. When European party oversight remains largely invisible for years despite rule-of-law debates surrounding Fidesz and PiS, but then activates against ESN, the selectivity appears obvious, he argued.

Party Learned of Charges Through Media

The proceedings became public through a Politico report on May 27. ESN issued a statement that same day noting it first learned of the allegations through media coverage rather than official notification.

The party indicated it expects to receive the full 300-page document to properly evaluate and understand the charges before formulating a comprehensive response.

Millions in Funding and Electoral Infrastructure at Stake

Loss of official EU party status would strip ESN of approximately two million euros annually in EU party financing. Without party status, there can be no foundation with separate EU funding streams.

If the next EU elections in spring 2029 require transnational lists fielded by European parties, one competitor would be effectively neutralized. The beneficiary question looms particularly large in Germany, where a weakened ESN ahead of 2029 would primarily benefit the EPP and thus the CDU and CSU.

Should transnational lists become mandatory for the 2029 elections, the organizational, financial, and symbolic weakening of the AfD-backed ESN would eliminate a major rival before voters cast ballots.

Transparency Demands Mount

The Constitutional Affairs Committee of the European Parliament is now considering召oning Authority chief Pascal Schonard for a closed-door hearing. Committee coordinators from all political groups are deliberating whether to demand Schonard explain the timing and scope of the enforcement action.

The case represents the first major test of whether EU party oversight mechanisms will be applied consistently across the political spectrum or wielded selectively against conservative and sovereigntist movements. The outcome will shape the landscape of European party politics and determine whether regulatory tools designed to protect democratic values become instruments of political competition.

With information from Junge Freiheit