EU Air Passenger Rights Reform Faces Collapse
EU negotiations on air passenger rights reforms collapsed over disagreements on compensation thresholds, with Parliament defending three-hour delays and Council seeking weaker protections before a June 15 deadline.
Negotiations over a major overhaul of European Union air passenger rights regulations have collapsed after a marathon overnight negotiating session this week, with lawmakers from the European Parliament and the Council of the EU unable to bridge fundamental disagreements over compensation thresholds and payout amounts.
According to Brussels Signal, the reform effort—first launched by the European Commission more than thirteen years ago—now faces imminent failure as a hard deadline of June 15 approaches. If no agreement is reached by that date, the legislative proposal will automatically expire, leaving the existing 2004 regulation in place indefinitely.
The core dispute centers on when passengers should receive compensation for delayed flights and how much they should be paid. Under the current Regulation 261/2004, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 depending on flight distance if their flight arrives more than three hours late at the final destination.
The Council is pushing to dramatically weaken these protections by raising the delay threshold to four hours for short-haul flights and up to six hours for long-haul routes, while simultaneously reducing compensation amounts. The European Parliament has refused to budge, treating the three-hour rule as a non-negotiable red line.
Tomasz Pawliszyn, president of the Air Passenger Rights Association, condemned the Council’s negotiating stance. He told Brussels Signal that the outcome was incredibly disheartening for passengers and European travel.
Pawliszyn emphasized that Regulation 261 has successfully created a stronger and more competitive aviation market for over twenty years, supporting higher passenger volumes and greater mobility across Europe. He rejected arguments that airlines can no longer meet commitments they have successfully upheld for decades.
The passenger rights advocate warned that proposals under discussion would weaken protections through lower compensation and expanded exemptions for extraordinary circumstances, including attempts to revive the controversial technical excuse loophole. He pointed to Canada’s experience with similar loopholes, which has resulted in nearly 95,000 unresolved claims and an average waiting time of two and a half years.
Airlines Push Back Against Existing Rules
The airline industry has mounted a vigorous defense of the reform effort, arguing that the current system imposes excessive costs that are ultimately passed on to consumers through higher ticket prices. Industry representatives contend that rigid compensation rules discourage investment and undermine European aviation competitiveness.
Airlines for Europe, an industry lobby group, argued that the current three-hour delay threshold does not match tight operational realities. The organization claimed that safely organizing a replacement plane and crew takes closer to five hours, and that a more realistic threshold would reduce the longest delays by up to 40 percent.
The industry warned that under current proposals, annual compensation costs could nearly double from €8 billion to €15 billion. Airlines argue this burden will inevitably drive up airfares for European passengers at a time when many families are already struggling with rising travel costs.
Parliament Holds the Line
Lead MEP Andrey Novakov has made clear that Parliament will not accept a watered-down deal that significantly weakens passenger protections. MEPs have repeatedly stated they will not compromise on current levels and fundamental principles of passenger protection.
The deadlock represents a major setback for reform efforts that have been trapped in the legislative pipeline since 2013. With just days remaining before the automatic expiration deadline, prospects for a breakthrough appear dim.
Passenger rights advocates have positioned the European Parliament as the last line of defense for European travelers, calling on lawmakers to prove that their promises to defend consumer protections are more than empty words.
With information from Brussels Signal