Necessary Cookies

Required for the site to function. Cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with our site (Google Analytics via GTM).

Marketing Cookies

Used to track visitors and deliver personalised advertisements.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking Accept All, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
NewsFire Global
Home News Europe World Christianity Culture Wars Opinion Video
Information
About Us Authors Advertising Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact
R2B Media
R2B NEWSFIRE.GR PAPAFOTIS.GR THRACTION HELLENIC CONSERVATIVES RIGHT2THEBONE YT
News World

Clyburn Claims Supreme Court Trying to Reinstate Segregation

Democratic Representative James Clyburn accused the Supreme Court of attempting to restore segregation-era legal frameworks, citing recent redistricting battles and voting rights challenges across the South.

Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos Staff Writer
MAY 31, 2026 AT 11:29 PM

Speaking on MSNBC’s “PoliticsNation” on Saturday, Clyburn made the inflammatory claim while discussing recent redistricting battles and voting rights challenges across the American South, according to Breitbart News.

The South Carolina congressman’s remarks came in response to a question from host Al Sharpton about recent developments in redistricting cases. Sharpton referenced multiple Southern states where Republican-drawn maps have faced legal challenges, including Louisiana’s elimination of a majority-black district and a federal appeals court decision allowing Alabama to use a previously contested map.

Clyburn characterized these developments as part of a broader pattern targeting the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He pointed to the Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. Holder decision, which eliminated Section Five preclearance requirements, as the starting point of what he views as a systematic dismantling of voting rights protections.

The congressman noted that Chief Justice John Roberts had suggested at the time of the Shelby County decision that Section Two enforcement mechanisms would remain available if problems arose. However, Clyburn argued that subsequent rulings have effectively neutralized Section Two as well.

Clyburn warned that the Supreme Court’s approach could lead to consequences similar to those following the original Plessy v. Ferguson decision from the 1890s. He cited the historical impact of that era on African-American congressional representation, noting a 29-year period of severely diminished black representation nationally and 95 years of such underrepresentation in South Carolina specifically.

The congressman’s seat survived recent redistricting challenges, though he emphasized that the fight extends far beyond individual districts or states.

With information from Breitbart News

Share:
Stefanos Banos
Stefanos Banos

Stefanos Banos was born in Piraeus and is an editor at NewsFire.GR, specializing in political analysis and international relations. He graduated from the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Bremen in Germany, where he also completed his Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies. Married to Zoi, he is a proud father of three boys.

Speaking on MSNBC’s “PoliticsNation” on Saturday, Clyburn made the inflammatory claim while discussing recent redistricting battles and voting rights challenges across the American South, according to Breitbart News.

The South Carolina congressman’s remarks came in response to a question from host Al Sharpton about recent developments in redistricting cases. Sharpton referenced multiple Southern states where Republican-drawn maps have faced legal challenges, including Louisiana’s elimination of a majority-black district and a federal appeals court decision allowing Alabama to use a previously contested map.

Clyburn characterized these developments as part of a broader pattern targeting the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He pointed to the Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. Holder decision, which eliminated Section Five preclearance requirements, as the starting point of what he views as a systematic dismantling of voting rights protections.

The congressman noted that Chief Justice John Roberts had suggested at the time of the Shelby County decision that Section Two enforcement mechanisms would remain available if problems arose. However, Clyburn argued that subsequent rulings have effectively neutralized Section Two as well.

Clyburn warned that the Supreme Court’s approach could lead to consequences similar to those following the original Plessy v. Ferguson decision from the 1890s. He cited the historical impact of that era on African-American congressional representation, noting a 29-year period of severely diminished black representation nationally and 95 years of such underrepresentation in South Carolina specifically.

The congressman’s seat survived recent redistricting challenges, though he emphasized that the fight extends far beyond individual districts or states.

With information from Breitbart News