{"id":3168,"date":"2026-05-26T16:02:40","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T13:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/trump-supreme-court-case-takes-aim-at\/"},"modified":"2026-05-26T16:02:40","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T13:02:40","slug":"trump-supreme-court-case-takes-aim-at","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/trump-supreme-court-case-takes-aim-at\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Supreme Court Case Takes Aim at"},"content":{"rendered":"

Donald Trump<\/strong> is appealing the 2023 jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll<\/strong> in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room decades ago, a claim that lacked physical evidence, precise dating, police reports, or eyewitness testimony, according to New York Post.<\/p>\n

The jury awarded Carroll $5 million. Yet the case hinged not on hard proof, but on testimony from two additional women\u2014Jessica Leeds<\/strong> and Natasha Stoynoff<\/strong>\u2014who made their own decades-old allegations against Trump without any contemporaneous corroboration.<\/p>\n

Character Assassination by Committee<\/h2>\n

Leeds claimed Trump groped her on an airplane 37 years earlier, though she could not recall the exact date, airline, or destination. Stoynoff alleged Trump kissed her without consent at Mar-a-Lago in 2005, again without supporting evidence.<\/p>\n

Carroll herself could not remember the year of the alleged assault, never filed a police report, and despite claiming to possess Trump’s DNA on her dress, she declined to permit DNA testing and sought to exclude such evidence from trial, New York Post reveals.<\/p>\n

Trump’s legal team argues that allowing such inflammatory testimony violated his constitutional right to a fair trial. The women’s stories, while damaging, had no direct bearing on whether the specific incident Carroll described ever occurred.<\/p>\n

A Flawed 1995 Legal Change<\/h2>\n

The root of the problem lies in Federal Rules of Evidence 413, 414, and 415, enacted by Congress in 1995 exclusively for sexual assault cases. These rules permit prosecutors and plaintiffs to introduce testimony from prior accusers to establish a defendant’s propensity<\/em> to commit such acts\u2014even when those prior claims are unproven.<\/p>\n

The rules mark a stark departure from longstanding American legal tradition. For over a century, the Molineux precedent\u2014established in a landmark 1901 New York murder trial\u2014held that the accused has a right to be held to account only for the crime charged<\/em>, and that prior bad acts cannot be used solely to suggest a pattern of criminality.<\/p>\n

Sexual assault cases were carved out as an exception in the mid-1990s, driven by political correctness and the assumption that accusers in such cases should automatically be believed and celebrated as survivors.<\/p>\n

Appellate Pushback Emerges<\/h2>\n

Some courts are now reining in these abuses. In 2024, the New York State Court of Appeals overturned Harvey Weinstein’s<\/strong> rape conviction in a 4-3 ruling, finding that the trial judge improperly allowed testimony from women making unrelated allegations. Weinstein was granted a new trial.<\/p>\n

His attorney, Arthur Aidala<\/strong>, hailed the decision as a victory for every defendant in New York.<\/p>\n

But dissenting Judge Madeline Singas<\/strong> argued the ruling undermined survivors and claimed sexual violence cases require different evidentiary standards because strict proof requirements come at the expense and safety of women<\/em>, New York Post reports.<\/p>\n

Due Process Cannot Be Gendered<\/h2>\n

That rationale is deeply flawed. Fair trials are not a luxury reserved for certain crimes or certain defendants. Every accused person\u2014man or woman\u2014deserves to be judged on actual evidence, not a parade of unverified allegations designed to prejudice a jury.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court has now delayed its decision on whether to hear the Carroll case 11 times. Legal observers believe the justices may be waiting for a related Trump-Carroll case to reach them before consolidating the issues.<\/p>\n

Regardless of timing, the stakes are clear. If the high court does not overturn the Carroll verdict and dismantle the propensity-evidence framework that enabled it, the door remains open for politically motivated lawsuits to succeed on the basis of character assassination rather than proof.<\/p>\n

The conservative legal community is watching closely. Restoring due process protections in sexual assault cases is not about shielding perpetrators\u2014it is about preserving the rule of law and ensuring that justice is blind, not gendered.<\/p>\n

With information from New York Post<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Trump is asking the Supreme Court to overturn a 1995 legal rule that allowed unsubstantiated testimony from other accusers in the E. Jean Carroll case that resulted in a $5 million verdict.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":3167,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[122],"tags":[3066,196,3065,2415,3067,1143,209],"nfg_topic":[135],"class_list":["post-3168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-bergdorf-goodman","tag-donald-trump","tag-e-jean-carroll","tag-new-york","tag-sexual-abuse-case","tag-supreme-court","tag-united-states","nfg_topic-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3168"},{"taxonomy":"nfg_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsfire.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nfg_topic?post=3168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}